Negative power prices have swept across Europe in the first nine months of 2020, with excess power in the market resulting in consumers being paid rather than charged to use electricity. This is according to a new study conducted by data analytics firm EnAppSys.
The study showed that in the nine months to September 2020, European countries on average saw negative day ahead power prices almost 1% of the time (0.8% on average). These levels were typically 3-4 times higher than those seen between 2015 and 2018, and more than twice those in 2019.
During these periods, the markets could not use as much power as they generated. With supply required to match demand, the day ahead price of power in markets increasingly fell below zero – meaning that generators were charged for the privilege of producing power and electricity consumers were paid to use power.
Markets with high wind generation such as Ireland, Germany, and Denmark have been particularly affected by negative pricing as peak levels of wind output started to outpace the COVID-19-influenced levels of demand for power consumption.
The amount of overall energy demand covered by wind generation reached 49% in Denmark, 36% in Ireland, and 27% in Germany – the highest three rankings in Europe. As an example, Ireland saw negative prices for 4.2% of the time – well above the norm for Europe.
Germany experienced negative prices of -€83.94/MWh for eight hours on April 21. In this timeframe, the country not only experienced wind generation above the monthly average, but also high solar generation. Within this eight-hour period, solar and wind generation covered around 88% of Germany’s demand.
Belgium has also seen particularly low prices as the combination of high nuclear and solar generation have at times oversupplied the market during periods of low demand, with prices dropping to -€115.31 Euro/MWh on April 13.
Countries that have not experienced any negative pricing since 2015 are Bulgaria, Greece, Italy, Poland, Portugal, Romania and Spain.
The reasons for this activity vary from country to country. Countries in which renewable generation makes up only a small part of the overall power mix – such as Poland, for example – tend to operate in a less volatile market. Another example is Portugal, which is connected only to Spain; negative prices are not possible under the market rules of both countries.
Alena Nispel, business analyst at EnAppSys, said: “In such an event, generators will stop producing power if production costs get too high, making it unprofitable in the long run – as a result, the energy supply is reduced. Consumers are being paid in order to increase energy demand. However, the price we pay as consumers at home is not the same as the price the market pays. Instead, a fixed value that smooths out the extreme prices is more typically used.
“If the frequency of these events increases, it may become the norm to move away from the fixed value in the future and instead use more power when the market is oversupplied and less when power is at a premium.
Nispel makes it clear that 2020 was a unique year with increased interconnection between participating markets, a higher share of renewable output and lower demand due to COVID-19 and related shut downs. These variables caused a more volatile market.
Nispel continues: “It is here that we see one of the key challenges of renewables: their intermittency. Where the average output of a solar panel over a year might be 8% or the average output of a wind farm is around 30%, the peak output values will be very close to 100% of the potential output.
“The levels of demand for electricity are similarly intermittent. In the past it was possible to pair intermittent demand for electricity against a non-intermittent supply of generation (coal/ gas power stations) but pairing an intermittent supply (wind and solar) against an intermittent demand creates challenges.
“These challenges have so far been made more pronounced in 2020 as renewable generation levels continued to climb and demand for electricity declined across Europe as lifestyles changed in response to the COVID pandemic.
“Electricity storage can act to reduce these impacts – at least as far as it is economically sensible to do so – and new technologies that provide services without producing active power can help to reduce the generation required from conventional power sources. An example can be found in Britain as synchronous condensers are being introduced.
“In Britain, these synchronous condensers provide inertia to the market. In essence, inertia is a natural resistance to any changes in the electrical frequency of the market. This resistance means that frequency drops at a slower rate when a loss of supply occurs, as it is necessary to keep frequency within a certain range. “A market where frequency drops below this range very quickly is much harder to manage. In 2020 there were many occurrences of negative pricing when large power stations were still generating huge volumes of power to provide, not power, but “services” such as inertia.
“Replacing these power stations with an alternative such as a synchronous condenser – a motor that effectively still spins and provides inertia but without being attached to a generator – means that these plants can be switched off and more renewables can be accommodated in the market. This in turn acts to reduce instances of negative pricing.”
In the future, capacity at renewable projects is set to grow and the reduction of demand in 2020 gives an insight into the impact of what increased renewable capacity might look like. As noted, storage can reduce these impacts, as can increased flexibility in the markets, but activity so far in 2020 does highlight some of the areas in which markets may benefit from improvements going forward, albeit with many of those improvements already starting to be introduced.