COSPP May/June 2005 Editorial

The conventional wisdom is that cutting emissions will be a costly, but worthy, exercise. ‘No pain, no gain’. This universally held view permeates every corridor, negotiation room and plenary debate at the annual UN climate negotiations. This is why political progress to cut emissions has been so slow. It is why industry is at best cautious in its support of measures to reduce emissions, and why it argues that carbon targets in industrialized countries will simply lead to the ‘leakage’ of industry from north to south to keep costs down.

For all those that work in the cogeneration and DE fields, this is the most important challenge that we face. The ability to demonstrate the validity of this ‘win-win’ and convince the throng of sceptics will change the dynamics of the carbon debate. WADE is there. The Climate Group is there.

But where is industry? Those tens of thousands of companies whose energy bills are higher than they need to be are missing a big opportunity to swing policy their way.


Michael Brown, Editor
Cogeneration and On-Site Power Production

What to Read Next

Record factory becomes district heating energy hub

A former record factory that pressed tracks by The Beatles, Rolling Stones and Pink Floyd ha...

Mytilineos wins $132m deal for Slovenia CHP plant

Greek EPC company Mytilineos has won a €118m ($132m) contract for a new combined heat and power p...

CHP plant set to slash carbon emissions of paper mill

E.ON is to build a state-of-the-art combined heat and power plant at a paper mill in the UK.

Power Engineering International

FacebookTwitterLinkedInGoogle+RSS Feed